Read a new chapter of a romance novel daily—the Internet-exclusive daily online read at eHarlequin.com!
Mary Jo Putney - Interview for Romance catalogue July 18, 2001
1. How did you became a writer?
I'd always loved to read and sometimes dreamed of being a writer, but it seemed so impossible that it never occurred to me to think of writing as an achievable goal. Simply getting the words down in a clean, readable fashion was beyond me. Then I got a computer to use in my graphic design business, and it occurred to me that once you fix the words, they stay fixed. No more typos to worry about. So….I started to write a traditional Regency romance, I was lucky enough to find an agent, and three months after I started writing, I sold my first book. It still amazes me!
2. Your books are deeply social and very close to real life in telling about social problems - such as alcoholism or domestic abuse, as it was in 'The Rake', for example. Is it difficult to write on such topics?
Writing is always difficult, but these topics interest me, so they come naturally. I'm intrigued by stories of redemption, about people who heal and learn to make themselves stronger and happier. I research by reading and talking to experts and those who have suffered these problems, of course, because I want my work to be accurate as well as hopeful. As to alcoholism in particular-well, I knew an alcoholic. Doesn't everybody?
3. In your book 'The Wild Child' the heroine initially behaves and thinks as if she is mad. The transformation by the end of the book is dramatic...
I thought of her as a sensitive child who had suffered terrible trauma, and only survived by creating a private world where she was emotionally safe. That helped her survive, but when she was returned to a normal life, she didn't know how to escape from that private world. Plus, because she was an heiress, she was given considerable latitude to live as she wanted to, so there wasn't much incentive to change since that would mean forcing herself into scary, unpleasant situations. People thought she was mad, and it was easy to go along with that. The hero, Dominic, was the first to observe her closely and realize that though she was unusual, she wasn't mad. Dominic also helped her recognize how fragile her private world was-she was at the mercy of her guardians, and could easily end up in a horrible mental hospital. That recognition, plus her love for Dominic, finally gave Meriel the incentive to change even though change was painful and frightening. Luckily, she has a natural resilience that made it possible for her reconnect with the world around her. Plus, she had the advantage of having learned to read and write before her captivity, and she'd always had a wise, gentle Indian protector who understood her well.
4. How do you think out plots? (From Tatyana)
The process is rather like an oyster creating a pearl. Usually I start with a character who was minor in another book, or the germ of a story idea, such as "a sneaky man meets a sneakier woman." I spend a lot of time thinking about it, off and on, and gradually layers build up around that original idea. For example: Why is he sneaky? Because he is an intelligence gatherer during the Napoleonic wars. Why is she sneaky? She has to have a terribly compelling reason to justify all the lies she's telling, so the life of someone she loves must be threatened. Who would she love that much? How about a twin sister, whose identity she takes on so she can learn more? That would be fun. Piece by piece, the basic structure of a plot takes shape.
5. How much time do you spend for writing and what is your daily working schedule?
I'm not very creative or focused in the morning, so I run errands and read e-mail and things like that. In the afternoon, probably I'll start editing work I've already written. Most new pages are written between seven and eleven at night. I do a book about every nine months, and would never finish anything without a deadline!
6. I have an impression (having read several books), that the number of plots is limited (by classic ones, like Shakespeare), and there is a big number of various decorations, backgrounds, and the author, in accordance with his preferences, may vary the endings (for example, in Romeo and Juilet - people don't like the death of heroes - and here's a happy end for you). What is your opinion about it? (From Tatyana)
It's certainly one way to look at stories. Since this is a rather academic approach, I tend not to think about it one way or the other. What makes stories compelling is not the ways in which they are the same, but what is unique about them. For example, thousands of "marriage of convenience" plots exist in romance-I've written several myself-but each is different because the characters, setting, plot, conflict, and research are all different. (Or should be.) When an author writes for a particular market, such as romance, she needs to fulfill the expectations of her readers. In romance, that means a story built around a developing romantic relationship, and a happy ending. (At least, that's true in the kind of romance I do.) Within that basic structure, it's the writer's job to make the story fresh and appealing. If the story is well done, the reader probably won't care that it's still another "marriage of convenience" story.
7. Do you read other authors of your genre, and who are they?
These days I'm more likely to read outside romance for pleasure, because I get enough romance on the job! I tend to like science fiction and fantasy novels that have romantic subplots, for example. I grew up reading the romantic novels of Mary Stewart, Dorothy Dunnett, and Georgette Heyer, and love a happy ending.
8. Your favorite hero and heroine of your book are...
Impossible to say! I love all my characters, or I couldn't spend months writing about them, fighting with them, having them cry on my shoulder, and so forth.
9. The heroine of your book - 'Veils of Silk' - Laura Stephenson is Russian by nationality. Why did you choose Russian? (probably, what features of Russian character attracted you, or was it by chance? Do you think on writing a book with another Russian heroine or hero? - G.P.)
The origin of her nationality was the "Great Game," which was the struggle between the Russian and British empires. This was a kind of cold war that continued for a long, long time, but was at its height in the 19th century. Both countries wanted control of Central Asia, with the British wanting to defend and expand their authority in India, and Russia wanting to conquer as much of Asia as they could. Fascinating things happened in Central Asia! So it made sense for Ian, a British army officer, to end up imprisoned with a Russian army officer in Bokhara. I liked the idea of Ian and Pyotr Andreyovich becoming friends even though their nations were hostile. Given that situation, I needed to make the connection between Ian and the heroine. As Pyotr Andreyovich's niece, it makes sense she would be Russian. An English stepfather provided a reason for her to be in India, which had been Ian's home for many years. As I said above, it's a matter of building a story step by step, creating a solid chain of logic. I also liked the idea of having her Russian because Westerners tend to think of Russians as intense and passionate. Having seen the disastrous, obsessive relationship between her parents, it made sense that Laura would fear passion. Her fears, plus Ian's depression and conviction that he was no longer capable of sexual intimacy, provided the basis for a marriage of convenience based on friendship. Of course, that's not how it turned out. <g> But I wanted it to make sense to the characters as they lived their lives.
10. Why increasingly more writers of romance genre started to write suspense or even futuristic-mystery books? The reader feels deceived. (I may also add that Russian editors do not distinguish romances or suspenses and if they written by the same author, they are often published in the same series with romances, and the problem gets even more sharp - G.P.) (From Anonymous)
There are different reasons. Often a writer who has done many romances feels the need for a change, before she goes stale or burns out. (This is the reason I started writing contemporaries, though I don't intend to do suspense.) Also, many writers really enjoy the suspense and want to do it, and commercially, successful romantic suspense can sell very well because men as well as women will buy it, while romance is read almost exclusively by women, at least in the US. Perhaps you can encourage your friends, and others through your website, to write your Russian publishers and ask them to mark the books as either romance or romantic suspense, so readers will know what they're getting. This works in the US. (There are also many romance readers here who do not love it when their favorite authors turns to writing grisly suspense novels.)
11. Tell us some words about your new book - 'The Bartered Bride' (I am also very curious why 'bartered'? - G.P.)
The hero of The Bartered Bride is Gavin Elliott, a trader who first appeared in the China Bride. He's Scottish by birth but has been raised in the United States and considers himself American. He's lived many years in the East, and is on his way to London to set up a new trading office when he accidentally finds a English woman who has been enslaved in the East Indies. He can't bear to leave a countrywoman in slavery, so he has to "barter" for her freedom. (Actually, he has to win her, but bartered sounds good.) The heroine, Alexandra, is a widow on the way home from Australia with her daughter when she's captured. Lots of things happen. <g> (Alexandra is her middle name-under her Christian name, Amy, she was daughter of the heroine in Shattered Rainbows. Lots of people wanted to see a story about her.)
12. 'The Bartered Bride' is finished. What's next?
A Christmas novella with a contemporary setting, than another contemporary romance, my third. The second, The Spiral Path, will be out in the US in January 2002. After that, another historical romance.